While the dynamics of the Middle East conflict continue to change, one question continues to surface: Can there be peace in the Middle East? The answer is yes. But peace requires that the world recognize that the true obstacle to peace is rising extremism in Israel, and the need for Israelis to finally recognize the right of Christians and Muslims to Statehood, and the right of Palestine to exist, something most Israelis reject.
By Ray Hanania
covering Chicago
City Hall
(1976-1992)
I am asked many questions by readers, but the most common is this one: “Can there be peace in the Middle East?” And it is usually followed by “How can we achieve peace?”
Yes, there can be peace in the Middle East. It doesn’t matter how vicious one or both sides are during this unending conflict. It doesn’t matter how vicious the people are on both sides. It doesn’t matter about the obstacles.
What matters is the will to make peace. Do both sides want peace? I think the problem is the Israelis today lack the will or the desire to make peace.
In the 1950s and 1960s, the momentum for peace was being driven by the Israelis who publicly appealed for a peace based on compromise. The Arab side didn’t want peace, believing they could reverse history and turn the clock back to the 1930s, and rebooting Palestine as a secular, Democratic state where Christians, Muslims and Jews could live together in peace.
The Arabs had been humiliated and humiliation is a contributing factor in stubbornness.
As the conflict continued, the conflict worsened. Emotional rhetoric ratcheted up and the small extremist groups that embraced violence, on both sides, began to grow in influence and size. The dynamics of the Middle East conflict shifted in a circuitous fashion.
By the 1980s and early 1990s, radicalism and rejectionism rose among Israelis while more and more Arabs voices were urging peace based on compromise.
Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, President Bill Clinton and Palestinian President Yasir Arafat in 1993The influence of extremism in Israel was reflected in the increase in Israeli violence against the weaker and less armed and trained Arab targets, but shattered the glass ceiling on November 4, 1995 when an Israeli extremist assassinated Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin specifically because he signed a peace accord with the Palestinians and shook the hand of Yasir Arafat, the leader of the Palestine Liberation Organization.
Today, the dynamics are crystal clear. Israel’s government is the primary obstacle to Middle East peace.
After Rabin’s murder, the assassin was feted as a hero by many in Israel. And to reinforce the growth of Israeli extremism, Israeli voters overwhelming rejected the Israelis who advocated peace, like Shimon Peres and Ehud Barak, and instead embraced the fanatics who advocated violence, conflict and continued war, like Ariel Sharon and Benjamin Netanyahu.
The shift in Israel and the Arab World was basically a flip flop, and instead of softening, the positions were reinforced. Arab Governments began opening their doors to the concept of recognizing Israel formally and informally, while softening their support for civil rights for Palestinians.
=================
It is the Israelis who are standing in
the way of Middle East peace
=================
The weakening of support for Palestinian civil rights in the Arab World was a reflection of the increase in influence of tyranny in the Arab countries themselves. Civil rights and freedom of expression continued to be victims of growing tyranny in the Arab countries, especially in the Gulf Region.
Israel’s rejectionists could see the shift in the winds and reinforced their rejection while the Arabs continued to balance their own contradictions by on one hand softening their position on Israel in exchange for leniency from the West on their oppression against their own citizens.
The truth is the Western nations, like the United States, were more than willing to close their eyes to violations of civil rights and freedoms in Arab World countries that sought to work with the West and the United States. This model of American foreign diplomatic strategy was based on America’s morally impaired relationship with the Shah of Iran, one of the most brutal and oppressive tyrants in the region.
Basically, the United States bought off justice with foreign aide, trade and an agreement from the Middle East dictators to respect America’s foreign goals and agenda. In exchange, the United States closed its eyes to the most outrageous violations of civil rights and freedoms by its Arab allies.
Those Arab countries that didn’t align themselves with the Western and American foreign policy goals ended up in turmoil, like Iraq and Syria.
One of the most oppressive Arab countries, Egypt, collapsed into a spiral of tyranny in the face of the Arab Spring which crashed into Tahrir Square in Cairo in January 2011. First the Muslim Brotherhood bullied its way into government by overwhelming the elections. In the face of rising Islamicism, the Egyptian Military staged a coup and imprisoned Egypt’s first truly Democratically elected President, Mohammed Morsi.
Israel found a strong niche in the turmoil that ensued in the Arab World, and: The hypocrisy of the American administration; The weakening of the influence of Europe and the counterbalance of the old Communist regimes of the collapsed Soviet Union; China’s shift from an oppressive socialist state to an oppressive economic world bank.
For Israel, the Middle East is the perfect storm.
Surrounded by Arab nations that have either been bought off using American foreign aid and military support, or that have collapsed into chaos and anarchy, Israel has no reason to make peace with the Palestinians.
Israel’s government extremism is not the result of a military coup like in Egypt. It is the result of the people of Israel embracing rejectionism over peace. It’s the result of the majority of Israeli voters consciously backing an extremist government that has openly stated it will oppose any concessions to the Palestinians.
It’s not Palestine that is rejecting Israel. It is Israel that is rejecting Palestine. Israel’s government has rejected the Two-State solution!
Historically, the failure of peace is clearly the result of the majority of Israelis refusing to recognize the rights of Christians and Muslims and refusing to recognize the right of Palestine to exist as a state.
Although peace is at a distance, the truth is that rising extremism in Israel is the primary obstacle to peace in the Middle East.
Ray Hanania is an award-winning Palestinian American columnist managing editor of The Arab Daily News at www.TheArabDailyNews.com. Follow him on Twitter @RayHanania. To find out more about Ray Hanania and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit www.creators.com. COPYRIGHT 2015 CREATORS.COM.
His award winning columns can be found at www.HANANIA.COM Subscribe FREE today
Hanania also writes about Middle East issues for the Arab News, and The Arab Daily News criticizing government policies in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Hanania was named "Best Ethnic American Columnist" by the New America Media in November 2007, and is the 2009 recipient of the SPJ National Sigma Delta Chi Award for column writing.
Email Ray Hanania at rghanania@gmail.com.
Follow RayHanania at Twitter
- Israelisnipers shooting and killing hospital workers in Gaza - December 11, 2023
- CAIR Condemns Israeli Executions of Wounded, Unarmed Palestinian in West Bank - December 11, 2023
- Arab and Muslim American voters face a “simple choice” between Biden’s inhumanity and Trump’s edgy politics - December 9, 2023
