EU ban on settlement goods a moral necessity

EU ban on settlement goods a moral necessity
Share this Story:

The European Union properly voted to require Israel to correctly label products it produces in the lands it occupied in 1967. The Occupied West Bank and Golan Heights have been populated in violation of international law with armed and violent Jewish settlers on property taken from non-Jews who live under occupation and without fundamental human rights

By Ray Hanania

Ray Hanania covering Chicago City Hall (1976-1992)

Ray Hanania
covering Chicago
City Hall

Politicians and American activists love to blather long and hard about how America cares about issues of law, business responsibilities, and helping the poor more than do other foreign countries.

The truth is the United States likes to exaggerate a lot, believing that if they state it, it will be true.

But when it comes to the moral high ground, clearly the European Union stands far above the United States. Although in truth, the EU could go further an die tougher when it comes to doing what is right.

A good example is the EU decision to require Israel to end its deceptive practices of misleading consumers about where its products originate.

Until now, Israel has identified all of its products as coming from “Israel,” including those products that are produced illegally on lands taken from Christian and Muslim Palestinians in the West Bank and the Golan Heights, two lands occupied in violation of International Law by Israel in 1967.

The EU voted in November 2015 to require Israel to end that practice and identify products that come from the occupied West Bank – what Israelis racistly refer to as “Judea and Samaria” – and the Occupied Golan Heights as coming from those occupied lands.

The Arab Daily News

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

English: Golan Heights עברית: אחר צהריים חורפי...

English: Golan Heights, Original Image Name. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

If this were really an issue of morality and ethics, however, the EU would have gone further and banned Israel’s export of those illegal products taken illegally by force from he people it occupies militarily.

It comes down to this: Israeli settlers, who are all Jewish, have been growing food items such as dates, for example, on lands and with date palms stolen by force from the Palestinians, non-Jews. But, because Israel knows the world frowns on this human exploitation, Israel has allowed settlers to mislabel those dates as being “Made in Israel” or “Made in the Golan Heights” instead of “Made in the West Bank.”

This mislabeling of products has allowed Israel to dodge criticism of the moral bankruptcy of its claims to desire peace. False labeling has allowed Israel to be deceptive. It has allowed Israel to sell stolen products from stolen lands without accountability, without indictment for its brutal occupation policies, and without liability for the theft of that property.

Israel has worked hard over the past two decades to blur the line between the lands it occupied in 1948 and the additional lands it occupied in 1967 in order to hinder a peace process that requires Israel to surrender the occupied lands in exchange for a final peace.

It’s kind of ironic because the Nazis did the same thing to Jews during the 1930s and during the Holocaust of World War II.

Yet when it comes to lands and property stolen from Jews by the Nazis, Israel has a different view. Jewish leaders have demanded that Germany and other Axis powers acknowledge the land and property theft, and they have used that to litigate for victim’s rights. Jewish victims.

The problem with Israel today is that is likes to portray itself as the victim while going to great lengths to disguise and marginalize the real victims, the Palestinians.

When it comes to choosing between land and peace, Israel has talked about peace but has invested in retaining the lands. On its face, Israel’s policies prove that it doesn’t want a negotiated peace. It wants an imposed peace that maintains a separation between its claim on the lands and its desire to rid those same occupied lands of non-Jews.

Whether it is a blood diamond mined with the intent to profit and fund oppression and war, or a date grown by an armed Israeli settler on lands stolen from Christians and Muslims, consumers around the world and not just in EU countries have a right to know that the products they are buying are ethically challenged and stolen from other human beings who have been denied their fundamental human rights simply because they are Christian and they are Muslim.

If this were not a moral and ethical issue, Israel would be proud to declare to the world that it has pushed aside indigent populations from lands that it occupied by military force in a war it started in 1967, and is producing a product that belongs to someone else.

The fact that Israel is outraged by the EU action proves that what Israel is doing is wrong, legally and morally, too.

And, if the public purchases a product that they know was taken from another people who are occupied, brutalized and oppressed, they are morally complicit in the crime, too.

That would make it hard to sell dates anywhere.

Ray Hanania is an award-winning Palestinian American columnist, managing editor of The Arab Daily News at, and writer at Al Jazeera English. Follow him on Twitter @RayHanania. To find out more about Ray Hanania and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit COPYRIGHT 2016 CREATORS.COM.

Facebook Comments

The Arab Daily News

↑ Grab this Headline Animator



Managing Writer at The Arab Daily News
RAY HANANIA — Columnist

Ray Hanania is an award winning political and humor columnist who analyzes American and Middle East politics, and life in general. He is an author of several books.

"I write about three topics, the Middle East, politics and life in general. I often take my life experiences and offer them in an entertaining way to readers, and I take on the toughest topics like the Israel-Palestine conflict and don't pull any punches about what I feel is fair. But, my priority is always about writing the good story."

Hanania covered Chicago Politics and Chicago City Hall from 1976 through 1992. Hanania began writing in 1975 when he published The Middle Eastern Voice newspaper in Chicago (1975-1977). He later published “The National Arab American Times” newspaper which was distributed through 12,500 Middle East food stores in 48 American States (2004-2007).

Hanania writes weekly columns on Middle East and American Arab issues for the Arab News in Saudi Arabia at, the, and at He has also published weekly columns in the Jerusalem Post newspaper,, Newsday Newspaper in New York, the Orlando Sentinel Newspapers, and the Arlington Heights Daily Herald.

Palestinian, American Arab and Christian, Hanania’s parents originate from Jerusalem and Bethlehem.

Hanania is the recipient of four (4) Chicago Headline Club “Peter Lisagor Awards” for Column writing. In November 2006, he was named “Best Ethnic American Columnist” by the New American Media. In 2009, Hanania received the prestigious Sigma Delta Chi Award for Writing from the Society of Professional Journalists. He is the recipient of the MT Mehdi Courage in Journalism Award. He was honored for his writing skills with two (2) Chicago Stick-o-Type awards from the Chicago Newspaper Guild. In 1990, Hanania was nominated by the Chicago Sun-Times editors for a Pulitzer Prize for his four-part series on the Palestinian Intifada.

His writings have also been honored by two national Awards from ADC for his writing, and from the National Arab American Journalists Association.

The managing editor of Suburban Chicagoland Online News website, Hanania's columns also appeare in the Southwest News Newspaper Group of 8 newspapers.

Click here to send Ray Hanania and email.

His Facebook Page is

Visit this link to read Ray's column archive at the ArabNews,com
Share this Story:

The Arab Daily News

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *